First Christian Church

UK R&B singer Ms Dynamite sentenced for assault

">
UK R&B singer Ms Dynamite sentenced for assault

Thursday, January 19, 2006

The UK musician, Niomi McLean-Daley popularly known as ‘Ms Dynamite’ has been sentenced to carry out 60 hours of community service after admitting to assaulting a policewoman.

The rap star has been fined £750 in compensation.

Sky News reports that “she had hit the officer in the face at a London police station on January 6.”

According to Sky News, District Judge Timothy Workman said: “The injury sustained by that one blow were obviously more considerable than first thought.

“I accept that it was one blow and in the circumstances bearing in mind your good character, you have never been in court before, you are entitled to a discount on sentence.”

According to her solicitor the catalyst for the row was the racial abuse of her sister Annabell, 18.

The BBC reports that Ms Dynamite’s solicitor Anthony Burton said: “My client has absolutely no excuse for her conduct. She makes no bones about that.

She apologises profoundly for her conduct to the officer involved, Pc Marles. “She is deeply ashamed.”

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for war crimes

">
Charles Taylor gets 50 years for war crimes

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Charles Taylor, the former President of Liberia, has been today handed a 50-year sentence for war crimes in neighbouring Sierra Leone. The court previously held he financed a war which left an estimated 50,000 dead.

Taylor, 64, is considered likely to remain incarcerated for life if the sentence stands, but his legal team has vowed to appeal. The prosecution sought an 80-year sentence. Taylor’s is the first conviction of a head of state by an international tribunal since the fallout from World War Two, when the Nuremberg trials were underway.

The Special Court for Sierra Leone, which is operating from the Netherlands to avoid unrest if Taylor were tried in Africa, spent more than a year deliberating before convicting Taylor last month. Acquitted of ordering crimes or of acting in a joint enterprise to conduct them, he was nonetheless convicted of aiding and abetting the offences. There were 94 prosecution witnesses and 21 for the defence.

The allegations date to civil war in Sierra Leone, which ran from 1991 to 2002. Taylor, who had been a warlord since the ’80s, backed the rebel Revolutionary United Front (RUF). Taylor was elected Liberian president in 1997 after a different civil war concluded.

Six years later he was ousted when an arrest warrant was issued and fled to Nigeria. He was arrested there in 2006 whilst again trying to flee and went on trial later that year. Taylor, who had been facing a rebellion against him since 1999 in Liberia, received training from late Libyan ruler Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.

Testimony included claims that Taylor-backed fighters adorned roads with human intestines and ate human flesh. One claimed to have seen Taylor himself eat human liver, something Taylor denied. One described asking RUF rebels to sever his only hand in exchange for his young son’s life.

Further allegations said teenage children were involved in the fighting and that Taylor sold illegally mined diamonds to finance arms purchases for the RUF. Western celebrities Naomi Campbell, a model, and Mia Farrow, an actress, described an incident at a charity dinner held by Nelson Mandella, then South Africa’s head, in 1997. Campbell and Farrow said Taylor gifted Campbell a number of diamonds. Taylor is claimed to have ordered seizure of Sierra Leone’s diamond deposits by RUF soldiers.

It was claimed in court that child soldiers were used in conflict, as diamond mine guards, and to carry out amputations. Allegations of forced amputation were made. Taylor was convicted in late April of aiding and abetting forcing amputation, as well as rape, murder, child soldier recruitment, sexual slavery, and pillaging.

The court’s panel of judges, presided over by Judge Richard Lussick, heard a 30-minute address by Taylor at an earlier sentencing hearing. “I express my sadness and sympathy for crimes suffered by individuals and families in Sierra Leone,” said Taylor, adding he acted “with honour” and as a peacemaker, asking for “reconciliation, not retribution” in sentencing. Taylor also gave evidence at his own trial, spending seven months of testimony saying he strove for peace in the region.

Lussick noted the panel felt 80 years to be excessive given that Taylor was cleared of directly carrying out offences. However, the court found other factors aggravated the case: In particular, he was a head of state. “Leadership must be carried out by example by the prosecution of crimes, not the commission of crimes,” Lussick said in court. “The special status of Mr. Taylor as a head of state puts him in a different category of offenders for the purpose of sentencing,” the judge said, with the convict “in a class of his own”.

“[His] positions both as president of Liberia and within the west African regional bodies distinguish him from any other individual that has appeared before this court,” Prosecutor Brenda Hollis said at a sentencing hearing. “Taylor’s abuse of his authority and influence is especially egregious given that west African leaders repeatedly entrusted him with a role to facilitate peace.” She had claimed “No significant mitigating circumstances exist in this case.”

Lussick also told the court today Taylor stood convicted of “aiding and abetting, as well as planning, some of the most heinous and brutal crimes recorded in human history”. “The lives of many more innocent civilians in Sierra Leone were lost or destroyed as a direct result of his actions.” These were, the court said, crimes of the “utmost gravity in terms of scale and brutality”. The prosecution had claimed Taylor followed no more motivation beyond simple greed and power lust. Lussick said today the judges were unanimous in imposing a term of 50 years.

The defence had called for a sentence that gave Taylor a realistic prospect of eventual release. They also noted he is set to be sent to the United Kingdom to serve sentence. The defendant would be “culturally isolated”, facing a “punishment within a punishment”. At least one war crimes convict has been attacked in prison in the UK, and it is anticipated Taylor will end up in a high-security prison after the UK Foreign Office has promised to uphold an agreement to imprison him there made by ex-Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett.

“The sentence is clearly excessive, clearly disproportionate to his circumstances, his age and his health and does not take into account the fact that he stepped down from office voluntarily,” said counsel for the accused Morris Anya. The prosecution may also appeal the sentencing, and the verdict itself with intent to increase Taylor’s convictions beyond merely aiding and abetting. The defence also intends to appeal the verdict.

The appeals process means Taylor is likely to remain at The Hague for several months, where the court has been holding sessions in nearby Leidschendam. He is the last defendant to face trial before the Special Court, which has previously convicted and sentenced eight other prominent figures in the conflict.

Wikinews interviews Rocky De La Fuente, U.S. Democratic Party presidential candidate

">
Wikinews interviews Rocky De La Fuente, U.S. Democratic Party presidential candidate

Thursday, March 31, 2016

Businessman Rocky De La Fuente took some time to speak with Wikinews about his campaign for the U.S. Democratic Party’s 2016 presidential nomination.

The 61-year-old De La Fuente resides in San Diego, California, grew up in Tijuana, and owns multiple businesses and properties throughout the world. Since getting his start in the automobile industry, De La Fuente has branched out into the banking and real estate markets. Despite not having held or sought political office previously, he has been involved in politics, serving as the first-ever Hispanic superdelegate to the 1992 Democratic National Convention.

De La Fuente entered the 2016 presidential race last October largely due to his dissatisfaction with Republican front-runner Donald Trump. He argues he is a more accomplished businessman than Trump, and attacks Trump as “a clown,” “a joke,” “dangerous,” and “in the same category as Hitler.” Nevertheless, De La Fuente’s business background begets comparisons with Trump. The Alaskan Midnight Sun blog described him as the Democrats’ “own Donald Trump.”

While receiving only minimal media coverage, he has campaigned actively, and according to the latest Federal Election Commission filing, loaned almost US$ 4 million of his own money to the campaign. He has qualified for 48 primary and caucus ballots, but has not yet obtained any delegates to the 2016 Democratic National Convention. Thus far, according to the count at The Green Papers, De La Fuente has received 35,406 votes, or 0.23% of the total votes cast. He leads among the many lesser-known candidates but trails both Senator Bernie Sanders who has received nearly 6.5 million votes and front-runner Hillary Clinton who has just shy of 9 million votes.

With Wikinews reporter William S. Saturn?, De La Fuente discusses his personal background, his positions on political issues, his current campaign for president, and his political future.

Contents

  • 1 Interview
    • 1.1 Background
    • 1.2 Campaign
    • 1.3 Issues
    • 1.4 Future
  • 2 Related news
  • 3 Sources
  • 4 External link

categories Uncategorized | | comments Comments (0)

Hermes Uk Fine Art Law Firm Ensures You A Genuine Offer

Hermes Uk Fine art Law firm Ensures You a Genuine Offer

by

Rolland Blas

Art work in any kind is actually a sheer enjoyment on the eyes and also to art lovers. Fine art appears to be for being merely eternal and possesses an eternal elegance that\’s entirely enticing and mesmerizing. Artwork is one factor which is noticed by all and nobody can escape the elegance of artwork. In reality, any form of art manages to mesmerize all. One particular issue is for guaranteed and that is art work displays the truth and it reflects our day-to-day life. Any piece of artwork is a subject of worship for any fine art lover and towards the person who creates it. Art brings with it a planet of its own for a lot of and this might be evident from the way people indulge in getting artwork items. Having said that, the passage of time has brought as well as it tremendous quantity of fraud in nearly all factors of everyday living and evidently this form of fraudulence also touches fine art. Thus, once you come to a decision to buy oneself a piece of fine art or by any possibility are actually a sufferer of art work fraudulence, then you\’ll be able to seek out the help of an artwork law firm for any kind of a appropriate support pertaining to fine art issues.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7DrX_BgCmI[/youtube]

An artwork attorney can be a thorough specialized who can easily assist you to to come out of your fraud fine art circumstance and also be successful the situation in your case. Nicely the circumstances for which it is possible to employ an fine art legal professional varies however the a single matter which you must comprehend is the fact that an art legal professional ought to be consulted in any type of a fraud similar to art work and you can even consult him just before buying an excellent piece of art. Artwork lovers love indulging in art items and the top thing for them would be to invest in an art work piece from an authenticated artwork supplier who can produce one with genuine artwork parts. Nonetheless, deceptive artwork sellers control to market fraud art parts and people commonly tend not to understand that they\’ve bought a fake fine art piece. On this scenario, an fine art lawyer is where one need to go to get the authorized matters sorted out.

Having said that, an fine art lawyer not just allows a person to fight a legal situation for buying a fake piece of art work but also assists an art dealer to advertise the most effective items of fine art at the very best premiums and also assists him to have the obligations from prospects who delay in spending the quantity. Practically speaking, hiring an fine art attorney to solve scenarios related to art is the best matter to complete. On the other hand, ahead of you come to a decision to rent any particular art lawyer you ought to be sure that you search for attorney who has a superb encounter and achievements file and has won scenarios for his consumers. Then you ought to see the fee he expenses for every single circumstance and then if you experience that he fits your wants then you\’ll be able to usually go in with the fine art lawyer.

An art work layer could be the apt individual who might help a person arrive out of any kind of a fraud that he needed to face even though purchasing or advertising an artwork piece. Thus, when you previously experience that you have been cheated although purchasing or selling an art work piece you can often consider the steerage along with the aid of an art law firm to solve your case.

In case you require additional information and facts just stick to this :

coachbagsfactory2013.comDiscount Coach PursesLouis Vuitton Handbags Outlet

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com

categories Legal Services | April 13, 2018 | comments Comments (0)

5 Top Tips For Choosing The Right Umbrella

byAlma Abell

When shopping for quality umbrellas, it can be all too easy to become distracted by flashy patterns or a good gimmick–especially when you find a bargain price. However, as soon as the first serious rainstorm hits, many people find that a cheap showpiece is no substitute for a functional tool. Of course, there are plenty of quality umbrellas that are fun, smart, and affordable. Just keep these five tips in mind, and you are sure to find a great product that will last through years of use.

1. An Easy-Handle Sturdy Handle

When it comes to combating wet weather, keeping the rain off your head is often only half the battle. Make sure to find an umbrella whose handle offers an easy, sturdy grip that can withstand the wind as well as the rain. If you are the type of person who likes to keep their commute quick and efficient, you might also consider looking for an umbrella with an automatic open function.

2. Rounded Canopy Coverage

Unfortunately for anyone living in a windy area, rain does not always fall straight down. Choosing an umbrella with sloping sides and generous rounded canopy coverage can help you to keep your clothes and personal items safe from the worst blustering conditions.

3. Getting the Size Right

Selecting the right sized umbrella will depend on your personal preferences and needs. Compact umbrellas are perfect for stowing in a purse, small bag, or piece of carry-on luggage, but they may not provide enough coverage for all conditions. Many people like to keep a folding or compact version for commuting and traveling as well as a larger model that can accommodate a companion.

4. Focus on Fabric

While an expensive designer umbrella may have sleek appeal, you should always make sure that the fabric itself is functional. Quality umbrellas that make use of transparent materials can be great for providing excellent coverage without compromising your visibility.

5. Eye Catching Color

In addition to standing out from the sea of black canopies, picking a distinctive pattern or bright color has a number of advantages over something that blends in. When you have to leave your soaking umbrella at the front door, desk, or elsewhere, you will be able to find it again easily. Additionally, a really eight catching pattern can help to prevent confusion, and may even dissuade a would-be thief.

From fine fabrics to functional features, you should always keep in mind that quality umbrellas should offer more than just a flashy exterior. Whether used for commuting, exercise, or leisure, quality umbrellas should have a sturdy build and plenty of coverage while still being easy to carry and stow. Visit Website to check out our collection.

Raintecumbrella.com

categories Car Parts | | comments Comments (0)

“One-litre car” may help traffic pollution

">
“One-litre car” may help traffic pollution

Saturday, October 14, 2006

Professors at the Energy Science Centre, attached to the Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ) in Zurich, have presented their contribution of a car quite similar to Loremo able to travel 100 kilometres (around 62 miles) on a tank with just 1 litre (around 1 quart), equalling to about 235 miles per gallon. They presented their contribution during Swiss Energy Week.

The automobile, which has and will be manufactured by the Swiss company Horlacher, is 75% lighter than an average family car and guzzles a tenth of the fuel thanks to vastly improved aerodynamics.

One drawback to this car is that it has none of the modern safety features found in many cars to-day. But the FIT team is designing technology that lets cars communicate with each other to avoid collisions, using similar computer systems to those in aircraft.

“This car does compromise on style, speed and comfort, but you can’t have a free lunch,” says Lino Guzzella, one of the centre’s members

Business as usual is no longer an option. If we are to survive in the future, we will have to drastically reduce carbon emissions.” Guzzella continued.

There are approximately 800 million cars on this planet and in Switzerland there are 500 cars per 1,000 people, compared with 800 in the United States and less than 50 per 1,000 in India and China.

Swiss drivers also favour more powerful, polluting vehicles than the rest of western Europe. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers Association, the main lobbying group of the automobile industry in the European Union, the average car in Switzerland has a 2 litre engine compared with 1.6 litres in neighbouring countries.

“The Swiss think they are better at cutting harmful emissions than anyone else, but they are not,” says researcher Peter de Haan van der Weg.

He believes Switzerland should introduce incentives to make people buy cleaner cars. Some countries already have such schemes: the US awards tax breaks worth up to $3,000 and the Netherlands offers €6,000 to green car owners. The Swiss authorities are currently thinking about two similar options presented by the city of Bern and the centre-left Social Democratic Party.

“Individuals are not capable of understanding the big picture because it is difficult for people to look 50 years into the future,” Mr. De Haan van der Weg said.

“Therefore it is necessary to have government regulations to force changes that will benefit the environment.”

categories Uncategorized | | comments Comments (0)

Australia’s “most powerful” windfarm approved

">
Australia’s “most powerful” windfarm approved

Sunday, August 20, 2006

The government of Victoria has announced plans to build what it says will be Australia’s “most powerful wind farm.” Planning Minister Rob Hulls has given the go ahead to a new $380 million wind farm at Mount Gellibrand in the state’s south-west.

“I’m pleased to announce that I have approved Australia’s most powerful and Victoria’s largest wind farm to date,” Mr Hulls said. “This project is expected to create anywhere between 110 and 120 jobs during construction and up to 25 full time positions during the life of the wind farm,” he said.

The massive wind farm will be located 120 km west of Melbourne, close to the regional centre of Colac. The wind farm comprises 116 turbines of the 2 MW class – with an overall capacity of 232 MW. The wind farm will produce over 700,000 MWh annually of clean energy which is enough to supply approximately 132,000 Victorian households. German company Pro Ventum International is undertaking the project

Minister Hulls said only nine objections had been lodged against the project. Local landowner Tim Gore, who plans to have 32 turbines on his property, said he was not concerned about potential noise from the turbines. Pro Ventum International say they will commence work on an Environmental Management report the next few weeks.

Wind farm critic Tim Le Roy said there was no environmental benefit from the project at all and the Victorian government would better spend its money on geo-thermal energy.

The turbines, each 125 metres tall, will be visible from the Princes Highway between Geelong and Colac, sited at the foot of Mount Gellibrand.

In October last year, Colac Otway council’s chief executive officer, Tracey Slatter, said the proposal would benefit the shire: “…we’re looking at reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and with the demand of energy set to increase it is important that we do consider these renewable energy sources,” she said.

categories Uncategorized | | comments Comments (0)

Victoria Wyndham on Another World and another life

">
Victoria Wyndham on Another World and another life

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Victoria Wyndham was one of the most seasoned and accomplished actresses in daytime soap opera television. She played Rachel Cory, the maven of Another World‘s fictional town, Bay City, from 1972 to 1999 when the show went off the air. Wyndham talks about how she was seen as the anchor of a show, and the political infighting to keep it on the air as NBC wanted to wrest control of the long-running soap from Procter & Gamble. Wyndham fought to keep it on the air, but eventually succumbed to the inevitable. She discusses life on the soap opera, and the seven years she spent wandering “in the woods” of Los Angeles seeking direction, now divorced from a character who had come to define her professional career. Happy, healthy and with a family she is proud of, Wyndham has found life after the death of Another World in painting and animals. Below is David Shankbone’s interview with the soap diva.

Contents

  • 1 Career and motherhood
  • 2 The politics behind the demise of Another World
  • 3 Wyndham’s efforts to save Another World
  • 4 The future of soap operas
  • 5 Wyndham’s career and making it as a creative
  • 6 Television’s lust for youth
  • 7 Her relationship today to the character Rachel Cory
  • 8 Wyndham on a higher power and the creative process
  • 9 After AW: Wyndham lost in California
  • 10 Wyndham discovers painting
  • 11 Wyndham on the state of the world
  • 12 Source

categories Uncategorized | | comments Comments (0)

Bush: Congress should approve ‘vital’ bill

">
Bush: Congress should approve ‘vital’ bill

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Speaking in his radio address on Saturday, George W. Bush said that the US will lose its ability to carry out surveillance against suspected terrorists abroad as the US Congress did not approve a renewal of the law which allows the US Intelligence agencies to record phone calls without a warrant.

Mr. Bush started by saying that “At the stroke of midnight tonight, a vital intelligence law that is helping protect our nation will expire.” Right from the opening of his speech, he made it clear that he believed Congress should have passed the bill. During the speech, Bush also said that he believes “Congress had the power to prevent this [the bill not being renewed] from happening, but chose not to.”

In a statement, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded to the speech by saying that “Their [George Bush’s] true concern here is not national security.” They said that Bush wants “to protect the financial interests of telecommunications companies and avoid judicial scrutiny of their warrantless wiretapping program.”

The address comes as George Bush leaves on his trip to Africa, with the address being pre-recorded to allow him to make the visit to Africa.

Bush concluded the speech by stating that he believes “the Senate has shown the way by approving a good, bipartisan bill,” and that “the House [of Representatives] must pass that bill as soon as they return to Washington from their latest recess.” He added that he believes that “at this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning a new attack on America.” and that “Congress has no higher responsibility than ensuring we have the tools to stop them.”

categories Uncategorized | | comments Comments (0)

40 alleged drunken Santas accused of running amok

">
40 alleged drunken Santas accused of running amok

Monday, December 19, 2005File:Santarchy new zealand.jpg

The conduct by a group of ‘Santas’ making an unclear statement last Saturday is not appreciated in the business district of Auckland, New Zealand. The event, organized in the discussion forum of an online skateboard magazine, caused big media publicity.

Alex Dyer, spokesman for the group, stated that Santarchy in Auckland is part of a worldwide phenomenon. It is disputed if Santarchy is a protest against the commercialization of Christmas or not.

Auckland Central Police spokesperson Noreen Hegarty said to the press that the rampage began in the early part of the afternoon when men wearing ill-fitting Santa costumes threw beer bottles and urinated on cars from an overpass, then rushed through a central city park, overturning garbage bins, throwing bottles at passing cars and spraying graffiti on office buildings.

“They came in, said ‘Merry Christmas’ and then helped themselves,” said a convenience store staff member Changa Manakynda, according to local newspapers.

One writer using the pseudonym ‘Le_SigNagE’ on the Santarchy! (or also known as the Santacon) website commented, “… after all, this is what Christmas is really about… mindless vandalism and petty theft.”

Another writer who posted under the pseudonym Santy Claus said of the media coverage,”There was some major misreporting and Chinese whispers. Breaking bottles and urinating under a bridge, became throwing rocks at buses and urinating on cars from an overpass. The ‘organisers’ as they were, saw little in the way of crime other than one santa attempting to board a foreign vessel by scaling 20 metres along a rope 60 feet in the air. The difficulty and motor skills involved in this task alone should be a defense in itself of being ‘drunk’ and ‘disorderly’.”

Due to Santa’s reputation for integrity and his strict media policy, his sparse communication is mostly one-way: receiving lists from children with wishes for Christmas. It is difficult to get his comment about New Zealands skateboard interested ‘Santas’.

In 1994, the Cacophony Society staged the world’s very first SantaCon in San Francisco. Influenced by the surrealist movement Discordianism, and other subversive art currents.

categories Uncategorized | | comments Comments (0)